Indian occupiers are rethinking what office space needs to deliver. The decision is no longer anchored to square footage alone, but to the quality of that space, its location, and the capability it unlocks for the business. CBRE’s 2026 India Office Occupier Survey frames the scale of this: 55% of occupiers evaluating relocation are prioritising higher-quality buildings specifically to strengthen employee experience and support future growth (CBRE’s 2026 India Office Occupier Survey).
The leasing data reflects this strategic shift. Across 2025–H1 2026, 61% of office leasing in India occurred in core micro-markets, and 41% was concentrated in investment-grade assets.
For corporate real estate leaders, this reframes relocation, renewal, and expansion as decisions that extend well past rent. Commute access, talent reach, asset quality, employee experience, technology, and ESG credentials now sit alongside cost as evaluative criteria.

The Forces Shaping This Decision
A number of factors are informing how occupiers are weighing their options.
● Location and connectivity. 70% of occupiers place commute and connectivity among their top three site-selection criteria, and 47% favour core or established micro-markets.
● Talent accessibility. 56% rank talent accessibility among their top three criteria, a clear signal of how closely location is now tied to workforce strategy.
● Building quality and workplace experience. 35% rank asset quality and workplace experience among their top three criteria when choosing within a city.
● Sustainability. 52% have defined ESG goals for their real estate portfolios, embedding sustainability deeper into workplace strategy.
● Technology and flexibility. 38% point to smart building systems as among the features most relevant to an AI-driven future of work, and 67% expect flexible space in their portfolio within two years.
Quality considerations are increasingly embedded in broader portfolio decisions. Occupiers pursuing expansion are factoring in how additional space can lift overall workplace quality, while those facing renewal are weighing continuity against the case for better-located, higher-quality space.
Notably, AI adoption has not weakened this focus. 57% of occupiers report no measurable impact from AI on leasing decisions to date. As AI reshapes workplace usage, the strategic priority remains offices that support collaboration, employee experience, talent attraction, and future technology needs.
What’s Driving the Underlying Demand
Decision point: the office’s role after hybrid work
Hybrid work has reset expectations of what the office needs to deliver. 77% of surveyed occupiers report utilisation above 50%, with investment increasingly directed toward collaboration, focused work, and overall experience.
Where investment is heading:
● Enclosed or soundproof spaces for video calls: 52%
● WorkTech such as booking apps and sensors: 50%
● Collaborative spaces for unscheduled catch-ups: 48%
● Meeting rooms for up to five people: 47%
Accommodating hybrid work remains a key focus area for 50% of occupiers.
The strategic implication: the office must deliver something remote work cannot, which puts collaboration, interaction, and flexibility at the centre of design decisions.
Decision point: talent and connectivity
Commute and connectivity (70%) and talent accessibility (56%) are the two most heavily weighted site-selection criteria. This connectivity concern extends into risk assessment too: 95% view traffic congestion and commute as a threat to operations and employee experience, and 66% cite public transit access and last-mile connectivity as infrastructure risks.
For occupiers, the location decision now factors in both ease of access for employees and proximity to the relevant talent pool, not just the address itself.
Decision point: sustainability as a baseline
52% of occupiers have defined ESG goals for their real estate portfolios, rising to 82% among large companies. As these commitments become further embedded in corporate real estate strategy, green certification and sustainable features are shifting from differentiators to baseline requirements.
CBRE’s sustainability advisory supports organisations pursuing green building certifications including LEED, IGBC, and GRIHA.
Decision point: building services and technology
Occupiers are also raising expectations of developers and landlords.
75% want developer support on safety and security infrastructure, and 69% expect support for app-based service experiences.
Smart building systems carry particular weight for an AI-driven future of work. 38% cite features like sensor-driven utilisation and predictive maintenance as among the most significant, making smart systems the top-ranked feature in this category.
Building quality is therefore no longer a function of physical design alone; technology, services, safety, and infrastructure all factor into the strategic assessment.
What the Leasing Data Confirms
|
Indicator |
Share |
|
All office leasing in core micro-markets |
61% |
|
All office leasing in investment-grade assets |
41% |
|
Leasing transactions in core micro-markets that were in investment-grade buildings |
46% |
|
New office completions that were investment-grade assets |
57% |
Source: CBRE’s 2026 India Office Occupier Survey
Reading the signal
Stated preference and observed activity align: 47% of occupiers prefer core or established micro-markets, and leasing volumes are concentrated accordingly.
Investment-grade assets also capture a significant share of leasing within core micro-markets, confirming that asset quality is weighted alongside location, not traded off against it.
New supply is tracking the same direction, with investment-grade assets making up 57% of new office completions.
Together, these signals describe a market where accessibility, quality, and future-readiness are being pursued simultaneously, not sequentially.
Why Location Remains the First Strategic Variable
Core micro-markets as the default position
Occupier location preferences for new office space break down as follows:
● Core or established micro-markets: 47%
● A combination of core and non-core: 25%
● Non-core or emerging micro-markets: 8%
● No clear preference, or dependent on requirements: 20%
This preference strengthens notably among GCCs: 58% favour core micro-markets, against 36% of non-GCC occupiers.
For GCCs specifically, CBRE identifies commute optimisation and established infrastructure as key levers for talent attraction and retention.
The availability constraint occupiers must plan around
40% of occupiers are concerned about the availability of high-quality, well-located space through 2028, with 29% specifically concerned about assets meeting both criteria at once.
This constraint elevates the strategic importance of early planning for occupiers assessing relocation or expansion. Understanding availability ahead of urgent need preserves optionality.
Transit access as a decisive variable
Public transport access ranks among the most consequential factors shaping occupier response to an asset. 38% would exit, reject, or seek a discount on a building without it.
This reinforces connectivity as a core pillar of the flight-to-quality decision. A high-quality building with poor access may fail to deliver the workplace experience or talent reach occupiers require, regardless of asset grade.
Infrastructure as a market-shaping variable
Infrastructure investment is reshaping the competitive position of both established and emerging business districts.
CBRE Research tracks upcoming metro, road, and airport projects across Bengaluru, Mumbai, Delhi-NCR, Hyderabad, Pune, Chennai, and Kolkata. Districts positioned to benefit include Outer Ring Road in Bengaluru, BKC and Powai in Mumbai, and Financial District in Hyderabad.
For occupiers, planned infrastructure should factor directly into any long-term locational assessment.
Redefining What “High Quality” Means
A high-quality office is no longer defined by the asset alone; occupiers are assessing the full experience it delivers.
|
Attribute |
What occupiers report |
|
Commute and connectivity |
70% rank it among their top-three site selection criteria |
|
Talent accessibility |
56% rank it among their top-three criteria |
|
Asset quality and workplace experience |
35% rank it among their top-three criteria |
|
Asset stature |
24% rank it among their top-three criteria |
|
Safety and security |
23% rank it among their top-three criteria; 75% want developer support |
|
Green building certification |
26% would exit, reject or seek a discount if absent |
|
Health and wellbeing certification |
30% would exit, reject or seek a discount if absent |
|
Smart building systems |
38% cite them among the features that would matter most in an AI-driven future of work |
These findings confirm that quality assessment now spans multiple dimensions: location, accessibility, workplace experience, sustainability, technology, and building services.
A Decision Framework for Quality Relocation
A relocation decision should assess value across nine dimensions, not rent in isolation.
● 1. Location: Is the asset within a core or established micro-market, or a location supported by planned infrastructure?
● 2. Building quality: Does it meet current expectations for workplace experience, safety systems, certifications, and integrated campus features?
● 3. Accessibility: Does it offer reliable public transport and last-mile connectivity? This is among the strongest determinants of occupier retention.
● 4. Rental economics: Weigh rent and escalation against lease terms, commute, asset quality, and employee experience. Only 30% of occupiers rank rentals and escalation in their top three, against 70% for commute and connectivity.
● 5. Employee experience: Does it support collaboration, hybrid work, wellbeing, and organisational identity? 65% cite identity and culture through design as a focus area.
● 6. Sustainability: Does the asset align with organisational ESG goals and certification requirements?
● 7. Technology and infrastructure: Are smart building systems, app-based services, and reliable infrastructure present?
● 8. Flexibility: Can flexible space complement the core lease? 67% of occupiers expect flexible space in their portfolio within two years.
● 9. Long-term scalability: Can the location and asset support future growth? 77% of occupiers expect their India office portfolio to grow over the next two years.
The strategic shift is from evaluating rent to evaluating total value, weighing access, talent reach, employee experience, technology, and flexibility alongside cost.
Strategic Implications Across the Ecosystem
For occupiers
Relocation and expansion planning should begin well in advance, given constrained availability of high-quality space in established locations.
Flexible workspace offers a structural lever for speed-to-market and portfolio agility, reducing dependence on a single conventional lease decision.
For landlords and developers
The strategic opportunity lies in developing assets that match evolving occupier priorities:
● Prioritising commute access and transit connectivity in site selection
● Designing AI-ready buildings with smart systems and reconfigurable spaces
● Investing in workplace experience and employee-focused amenities
● Developing quality office space in select Tier-II cities
● Partnering with occupiers on safety, security, and employee experience
75% of occupiers want developer support on safety and security infrastructure, and 61% expect developers to partner on improving employee experience.
For investors
For investors, the flight to quality represents a repositioning opportunity: upgrading ageing assets to align with shifting occupier expectations.
CBRE’s view is that green certification is moving toward becoming standard practice, while commute access and asset experience remain stronger levers for differentiation.
Retrofitting is gaining strategic attention as well. 36% of occupiers are considering upgrading older offices for energy efficiency, underscoring that improving existing stock is becoming as strategically relevant as new development.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does flight to quality mean in commercial real estate?
It describes the strategic shift of occupiers toward higher-quality office buildings and locations. CBRE’s 2026 India Office Occupier Survey finds 55% of occupiers considering relocation are targeting better-quality buildings to improve employee experience and support future growth.
Why are companies moving to higher-quality offices in India?
Companies are evaluating office space against a broader strategic criteria set: commute and connectivity, talent accessibility, asset quality, workplace experience, sustainability, and technology. Commute and connectivity rank highest at 70%, followed by talent accessibility at 56% and asset quality and workplace experience at 35%.
How does location influence office relocation decisions?
Location remains a central strategic variable. 70% of occupiers rank commute and connectivity among their top three criteria, and 47% prefer core or established micro-markets. GCCs show an even stronger preference for core locations, at 58%.
Are occupiers willing to pay a premium for quality features?
The survey suggests sustainability is increasingly treated as a baseline requirement rather than a premium feature. Public transport access is the exception, with 18% of occupiers willing to pay a premium for it.
What share of India’s office leasing is in investment-grade assets?
During 2025–H1 2026, 41% of all office leasing in India occurred in investment-grade assets. Within core micro-markets, 46% of leasing transactions were in investment-grade buildings.
The Strategic Takeaway for Corporate Real Estate Leaders
India’s flight to quality is a strategic signal visible in both occupier behaviour and market activity. The central question for corporate real estate leaders is shifting from how much space is needed to which assets can support growth, talent access, and workplace expectations over the long term.
Before committing to a relocation, renewal, or consolidation, occupiers should assess:
Quality: Does the asset meet current standards for safety, technology, and workplace experience?
Location: Is it in a well-connected micro-market with reliable public transport access?
Employee experience: Does it support collaboration, hybrid work, and the workplace identity teams expect?
Portfolio efficiency: Can the move support current requirements while creating room for future growth?
Timing: Given constrained availability of high-quality, well-located space, how much lead time is required to secure the right option?
With demand for high-quality space in established locations remaining strong, early planning preserves greater strategic choice.
Planning a relocation, renewal, or consolidation? CBRE’s transaction advisors and workplace strategists work with occupiers across India to evaluate locations, assess asset quality, and identify space that meets long-term portfolio requirements. Connect with CBRE.
